<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 2.0//EN"
"http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-2.0.dtd">
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:nmmng="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/XML/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:34:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<title>No more Mr. Nice Guy!</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/</link>
<description>Proudly breaking down the white christian male power structure since 2003</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<generator>BlogDammit!</generator>
<copyright>Copyright 2003-2008 No More Mr. Nice Guy!</copyright>

<item>
<title>Republicans: racist scum</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c448c9</link>
<description><![CDATA[This speaks for itself: Georgia GOP congressman calls Obamas `uppity' Asked to clarify whether he int... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c448c9">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c448c9</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48c448c9</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48c448c9</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48c448c9"/>
<category>John McCain</category>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<category>Barack Obama</category>
<category>Racism</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Elections</category>
<category>stupidity</category>
<category>Rethug corruption</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This speaks for itself:
<br /><br />
<a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g8eMUng8c9fRJPvGHYOeolqH-uzwD930N50G0" target="new">Georgia GOP congressman calls Obamas `uppity'</a>
<blockquote>
Asked to clarify whether he intended to use the word, he said, "Yeah, uppity."
<br /><br />
In a statement Friday, Westmoreland - a white man who was born in 1950 and raised in the segregated South ? said he didn't know that "uppity" was commonly used as a derogatory term for blacks seeking equal treatment.
</blockquote>
I don't know whether it's true that Palin called Barack Obama a <a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/Did-Sarah-Palin-REALLY-cal-by-syQodem-080906-11.html" target="new">sambo</a>, but the more I find out about her, the more I despise her and all she stands for. Of course the rethugs are shrieking with outrage that anyone would dare suggest such a thing, mere days after they were smirkingly passing emails to each other joking that Obama would pick Sylvester Stallone as his running mate - <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2008143740_pitts28.html" target="new">"Rambo and Sambo"</a>.
<br /><br />
This is shaping up to be the dirtiest rethug campaign ever, something that will make the Summer of the Swift Boats look like a Methodist covered-dish supper. Only this time the swift boaters are the rethug nominees themselves, who set the tone at the convention when Palin - and a never-ending stream of pasty white millionaire men - got up to sneer at and denounce Barack Obama's career as community service, helping the poor and disenfranchised of Chicago's South Side with job training programs, college tutoring programs and tenants' rights organizations, at a time when Palin was entering beauty contests and John McCain was cheating on his first wife and lining his pockets in the Keating Five scandal, part of the <a href="http://www.unscrewingtheinscrutable.com/node/2043" target="new">S&amp;L collapse</a> whose fallout cost the US taxpayer $160 billion ($270 billion in today's money).
<br /><br />
The 'thugs are going for broke. They have no new ideas, nothing but a record of failure, incompetence, corruption and criminality. So their whole campaign is focused on destroying the opposition. They haven't given a minute's thought to how they would govern if elected; nuance is for elitists and pussies.
<br /><br />
If their reckless and destructive campaign wins, it's curtains for this country. We can't allow this to happen! We must bury the bastards in a landslide!<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c448c9#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rethugs sabotage Barack Obama's Wikipedia page</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c42f31</link>
<description><![CDATA[This is pretty pathetic and despicable. Republican activists have tampered with Barack Obama's Wikipe... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c42f31">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c42f31</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48c42f31</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48c42f31</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48c42f31" next="48c448c9"/>
<category>John McCain</category>
<category>Barack Obama</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Elections</category>
<category>stupidity</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is pretty pathetic and despicable. Republican activists have tampered with Barack Obama's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_obama" target="new">Wikipedia page</a>, so that when you view it, a large picture of John McCain pops up, obscuring the text. The page is supposed to be protected against vandalism, which unfortunately serves only to prevent legitimate users from removing this republican vandalism.
<br /><br />
Looking at the source code, here is the part that needs to be removed:
<br /><br />
&lt;div style="position:fixed; width=2000; height=2000; left:39%; top:15%; overflow:visible;"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/wiki/Image:Vote_McCain.jpg" class="image" title="Image:Vote McCain.jpg"&gt;&lt;img alt="Image:Vote McCain.jpg" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/bb/Vote_McCain.jpg" width="500" height="729" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
<br /><br />
Fortunately, you can remove the photo in most browsers by right-clicking on it and selecting "Block images from upload.wikimedia.org". Still, it speaks volumes about both the immaturity and the desperation of the rethugs that they would resort to such childish tactics.
<br /><br />
<strong>Update:</strong> the page has now been fixed. I hope the Wikipedia maintainers keep a tighter lid on it from now on.<br /><br />
(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c42f31#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>"Only our party can fix the damage that our party has caused."</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1c183</link>
<description><![CDATA[Good friggin' grief - how can McCain be such a brazen lying bastard and not get struck by lightning? ... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1c183">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1c183</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48c1c183</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48c1c183</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48c1c183" next="48c42f31"/>
<category>John McCain</category>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>corporatism</category>
<category>Elections</category>
<category>stupidity</category>
<category>Rethug corruption</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Good friggin' grief - how can McCain be such a <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080905/ap_on_el_pr/mccain_palin" target="new">brazen lying bastard</a> and not get struck by lightning? And how can anyone be so brain-dead as to buy this BS?
<blockquote>
"John McCain doesn't run with the Washington herd," said Palin, the surprise pick as McCain's running mate.
<br /><br />
"It's over. It's over. It's over for the special interests," McCain promised. "We're going to start working for the people of this country."
</blockquote>
For crying out loud - McCain has been working for the special interests for 22 years! He's been taking millions from lobbyists and dishing out billions to them in cronyist corporate welfare!
<blockquote>
"These are tough times for many of you, in the state of Michigan, times are tough," McCain said.
</blockquote>
And who caused the tough times? I don't suppose it was the party that has held a monopoly on political power for most of the last eight years? The party that is synonymous with greed, corruption, arrogance and incompetence? The party of which McCain is a senior member?
<blockquote>
"Change is coming, change is coming," McCain promised the audience, borrowing the same theme that Democrat Barack Obama has made the centerpiece of his run for the White House.
</blockquote>
You've had 22 years in the Senate, and you can't even come up with your own slogan, let alone change anything? Bite me, you old bastard.
<br /><br />
Jeez! If it's true that people get the politicians they deserve, then Americans must be the most evil people on Earth.<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1c183#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What Alaskan women think of Palin</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1bd69</link>
<description><![CDATA[In a word, not much. She is really just a mayor from a small town outside Anchorage who has been a go... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1bd69">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1bd69</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48c1bd69</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48c1bd69</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48c1bd69" next="48c1c183"/>
<category>John McCain</category>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Elections</category>
<category>stupidity</category>
<category>Rethug corruption</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In a word, <a href="http://pol.moveon.org/emails/palin_announcement.html?rc=homepage" target="new">not much</a>.
<ul>
<li>She is really just a mayor from a small town outside Anchorage who has been a governor for only 1.5 years, and has ZERO national and international experience. I shudder to think that she could be the person taking that 3AM call on the White House hotline, and the one who could potentially be charged with leading the US in the volatile international scene that exists today. <em>--Rose M., Fairbanks, AK</em></li>
<li>She is VERY, VERY conservative, and far from perfect. She's a hunter and fisherwoman, but votes against the environment again and again. She ran on ethics reform, but is currently under investigation for several charges involving hiring and firing of state officials. She has NO experience beyond Alaska. <em>--Christine B., Denali Park, AK</em></li>
<li>As an Alaskan and a feminist, I am beyond words at this announcement. Palin is not a feminist, and she is not the reformer she claims to be. --Karen L., Anchorage, AK</li>
<li>Alaskans, collectively, are just as stunned as the rest of the nation. She is doing well running our State, but is totally inexperienced on the national level, and very much unequipped to run the nation, if it came to that. She is as far right as one can get, which has already been communicated on the news. In our office of thirty employees (dems, republicans, and nonpartisans), not one person feels she is ready for the V.P. position. <em>--Sherry C., Anchorage, AK</em></li>
<li>She's vehemently anti-choice and doesn't care about protecting our natural resources, even though she has worked as a fisherman. McCain chose her to pick up the Hillary voters, but Palin is no Hillary. <em>--Marina L., Juneau, AK</em></li>
<li>I think she's far too inexperienced to be in this position. I'm all for a woman in the White House, but not one who hasn't done anything to deserve it. There are far many other women who have worked their way up and have much more experience that would have been better choices. This is a patronizing decision on John McCain's part- and insulting to females everywhere that he would assume he'll get our vote by putting "A Woman" in that position. <em>--Jennifer M., Anchorage, AK</em></li>
</ul>
John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin as his running mate is a desperate and dangerous gimmick. We cannot run the risk of being saddled with this inexperienced, untested Podunk politician, not to mention McCain's foul temper, poor impulse control and failing mental facilities. At least Dick Cheney was intelligent enough to know which laws he was breaking, and why those laws existed, but Palin is even more dangerous: an extremist filled with righteous certitude and openly contemptuous of due process, as the myriad scandals in which she is currently mired amply demonstrate.
<br /><br />
I'd rather have John Cleese and Michael Palin than John McCain and Sarah Palin!<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1bd69#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The gaffes keep on coming...</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1ac11</link>
<description><![CDATA[Considering how long John McCain has been dicking over the troops, and hiding behind his decades-old POW e... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1ac11">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1ac11</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48c1ac11</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48c1ac11</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48c1ac11" next="48c1bd69"/>
<category>John McCain</category>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Elections</category>
<category>stupidity</category>
<category>Rethug corruption</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Considering how long John McCain has been dicking over the troops, and hiding behind his decades-old POW experience while <a href="http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080904/OPINION03/809040444" target="new">stabbing them in the back</a> by voting at George Bush Junior's behest to cut their pay and block them from receiving <a href="http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/articleview/7351/" target="new">health care</a> and <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/dnc-mccain-watch-mccain-rhetoric/story.aspx?guid=%7B05E7123D-74B5-4893-AE58-829CA9695C50%7D&amp;dist=hppr" target="new">educational</a> benefits, it's no surprise that he wouldn't know what <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/09/john-mccain-acc.html" target="new">Walter Reed Hospital</a> looks like - I doubt he's ever been near it.
<br /><br />
But I'm surprised that the party that worships the great twin gods Free Market and Private Property has such a track record of <a href="http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b27431_republicans_take_heart_heart_takes_it.html" target="new">ripping off other people's intellectual property</a>, i.e. songs and music. The latest victim is the group Heart, who are understandably pissed that the McCain campaign has stolen their song Barracuda. Apparently this was Sarah Palin's nickname in high school, and I gather it wasn't exactly affectionate, but now she is wearing it as a badge of honor. Which is kind of appropriate when you read the <a href="http://www.metrolyrics.com/barracuda-lyrics-heart.html" target="new">lyrics</a>:
<br /><br />
And if the real thing don't do the trick<br />
You better make up something quick<br />
You gonna burn, burn, burn, burn, burn to the wick<br />
Ooh! Barracuda<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1ac11#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is it over yet?</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1893c</link>
<description><![CDATA[I tried to avoid watching the rethugs' NurembergSt. Paul rally as much as possible, but there were a ... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1893c">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1893c</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48c1893c</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48c1893c</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48c1893c" next="48c1ac11"/>
<category>John McCain</category>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<category>Barack Obama</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Elections</category>
<category>Useful idiots</category>
<category>stupidity</category>
<category>slobus vulgaris americanus</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I tried to avoid watching the rethugs' <span class="xout">Nuremberg</span>St. Paul rally as much as possible, but there were a couple of nights when I couldn't avoid it while channel-surfing - the networks were giving it <a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200809050001" target="new">saturation</a> coverage. Anyway, it occurred to me that if the proverbial man from Mars were watching, he would conclude that:
<ul>
<li>Barack Obama has been president for the last eight years, despite having been nothing but a (sneer) community organizer before that. (He probably deserted from the Illinois National Guard, too.)</li>
<li>The Democrats have held a monopoly on congressional and media power during the same period.</li>
<li>The Republicans are the outsiders, the change agents, the reformers who will clean up the cesspit of elite and entrenched Democratic corruption.</li>
<li>Teenage pregnancy is good, teenage pregnancy is cute, it's as American as apple pie, and a 17-year-old girl should be forced to "choose" to marry her trailer-trash statutory rapist. (Though the word "choice" is <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=184097&amp;title=bristol-palins-choice" target="new">taboo</a> for everyone else - <acronym title="It's OK if you're a republican">IOKIYAR</acronym>.)</li>
</ul>
In short, the rethug rabble-rousers are shamelessly <a href="http://www.mlive.com/elections/index.ssf/2008/09/fact_check_analyzing_attacks_a.html" target="new">lying</a> and pandering to the dregs of ignorance and stupidity, and said dregs are massively deluded and totally out of touch with reality.
<br /><br />
A long time ago I realized that there is simply no point in arguing with Republican true believers. You can point out for example that Palin is <a href="http://alaskareport.com/news98/x61589_palin_ted.htm" target="new">in bed with Ted Stevens</a>, that she (as Stephen Colbert put it) said "yes, please" to the <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/04/politics/animal/main4414049.shtml" target="new">Bridge to Nowhere</a> before she said "no, thanks" (and kept the $300-plus million anyway, improperly using it for other purposes), and you can cite objective sources until you are blue in the face, and the rethugbots will instinctively respond, "that's bullshit, you're a liar." It would never occur to them in a million years to look at any facts at variance with the narrative that has been endlessly drilled into them by the vast right-wing lie machine. They are like small children covering their ears and chanting, "nyah nyah nyah can't hear you."
<br /><br />
The convention was basically a cocoon and echo chamber for such people, the ones who need to be kept on a constant hatred high and who detest the well-known liberal bias of reality. Rile up the base and flip off everyone else is McCain's strategy for electoral victory. Will it work? I await the results with trepidation. As the saying goes, no-one ever lost a penny underestimating the taste or intelligence of the American public.<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c1893c#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Palin's Watergate</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c07f6b</link>
<description><![CDATA[It seems that Sarah Palin abused her power as governor to improperly access a state trooper's personn... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c07f6b">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c07f6b</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48c07f6b</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48c07f6b</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48c07f6b" next="48c1893c"/>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Elections</category>
<category>Rethug corruption</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It seems that Sarah Palin <a href="http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/09/04/1347737.aspx" target="new">abused her power</a> as governor to improperly access a state trooper's personnel file. Oh boy, this just keeps getting better!<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c07f6b#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Trumping the POW card</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c05a9e</link>
<description><![CDATA[The fact that someone was a POW 35 years ago qualifies them to be president today, right? Wrong, acco... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c05a9e">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c05a9e</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48c05a9e</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48c05a9e</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48c05a9e" next="48c07f6b"/>
<category>John McCain</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Video</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The fact that someone was a POW 35 years ago qualifies them to be president today, right?
<br /><br />
<a href="http://therealmccain.com/butler/" target="new">Wrong</a>, according to one of John McCain's prison mates. (He was also a classmate of McCain's, but finished near the top rather than at the bottom.)
<div class="ctrimg"><object width="470" height="393"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/_KjsEs46C70&hl=en&border=0"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_KjsEs46C70&hl=en&border=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="470" height="393"></embed></object></div><br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48c05a9e#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The company she keeps</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bef315</link>
<description><![CDATA[From TPM: The Alaska Independence Party, which was formed with the goal of seceding from the union an... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bef315">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bef315</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48bef315</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48bef315</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48bef315" next="48c05a9e"/>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>dominionism</category>
<category>christofascism</category>
<category>Elections</category>
<category>Conservative eliminationism</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[From <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/09/sarah_palin_and_the_alaska_ind.php" target="new">TPM</a>:
<blockquote>
The Alaska Independence Party, which was formed with the goal of seceding from the union and establishing Alaska as an independent state, says that [Sarah] Palin addressed their 2008 convention.
<br /><br />
"The problem with you John Birchers' is that you are too damn liberal!"
<br /><br />
-- Joseph Vogler, Founder Alaskan Independence Party
</blockquote>
Where is Joseph Vogler now?
<blockquote>
Fingerprint tests show that human remains found in a gravel pit east of Fairbanks on Wednesday are those of Joe Vogler, the founder of the Alaskan Independence Party, who vanished in May 1993, Alaska state troopers said today.
<br /><br />
The discovery of the remains, following an anonymous tip to the authorities, apparently resolves a year-and-a-half-old mystery concerning Mr. Vogler, a folk hero throughout the state who was 80 when he disappeared from his home here.
<br /><br />
The blue tarp and duct tape in which the remains were wrapped, officials said, matched a description given by a convicted thief, Manfred West, who confessed last summer that he had killed Mr. Vogler in a plastic-explosives sale gone bad and had then buried him. [<a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940CE3DB153CF936A25753C1A962958260" target="new">Link</a>]
</blockquote>
Okay, so Sarah Palin likes to hang out with snake-handling <a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bedd24">religious lunatics</a> and bomb-throwing militia lunatics, but she'd still make a good VP or even <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080903/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_giuliani_palin;_ylt=Amno9dFvLA3OZsBc3jXgIkas0NUE" target="new">president</a>... yeah, right.<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bef315#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Palin's Jeremiah Wright</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bedd24</link>
<description><![CDATA[ A review of recorded sermons by Ed Kalnins, the senior pastor of Wasilla Assembly of God since 1999,... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bedd24">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bedd24</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48bedd24</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48bedd24</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48bedd24" next="48bef315"/>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<category>Hypochristianity</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>theocracy</category>
<category>christofascism</category>
<category>Elections</category>
<category>stupidity</category>
<category>librull meeja</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
A review of recorded sermons by Ed Kalnins, the senior pastor of Wasilla Assembly of God since 1999, offers a provocative and, for some, eyebrow-raising sketch of Palin's longtime spiritual home.
<br /><br />
The church runs a number of ministries providing help to poor neighborhoods, care for children in need, and general community services. But Pastor Kalnins has also preached that critics of President Bush will be banished to hell; questioned whether people who voted for Sen. John Kerry in 2004 would be accepted to heaven; charged that the 9/11 terrorist attacks and war in Iraq were part of a war "contending for your faith;" and said that Jesus "operated from that position of war mode." [<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/palins-church-may-have-sh_n_123205.html" target="new">Link</a>]
</blockquote>
That's Ed Kalnins of the Wasilla Assembly of God church, which Sarah Palin attended since age 12. I understand videos exist of this preacher. Wanna bet the "liberal media" will play them in a continuous loop 24-7, like they did with Jeremiah Wright?
<br /><br />
Sheesh! The Sarah Palin Chronicles is getting more like the <a href="http://www.americablog.com/2008/09/jerry-springer-call-palins-asap.html" target="new">Jerry Springer</a> show every day.<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bedd24#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>You are the enemy</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bed876</link>
<description><![CDATA[ The US has undergone a profound transformation since 9/11. Live and let live used to be the general ... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bed876">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bed876</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48bed876</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48bed876</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48bed876" next="48bedd24"/>
<category>Police state</category>
<category>Totalitarianism</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="ctrimg"><img src="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/Images/APC.jpg" width="431" height="269" alt="Armored Personnel Carrier" /></div>
The US has undergone a profound transformation since 9/11. Live and let live used to be the general principle. Now every Podunk <a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/4423228f">police and sheriff's department</a> in the country has been showered with high-tech military gear and heavy firepower, and on the pretext of looking for terrorists under every bed, is turning the entire country into a prison.
<blockquote>
The Richland County, South Carolina Sheriff's Department (that's them above) just obtained an armored personnel carrier, complete with a belt-fed, .50-cal turreted machine gun.  Sheriff Leon Lott has charmingly named the vehicle "The Peacemaker," and insists that using a caliber of ammunition that even the U.S. military is reluctant to use against human targets (it's generally reserved for use against armored vehicles) will "save lives."
<br /><br />
Can we call this overkill, yet?  Is there any weapon people like Sheriff Lott would consider inappropriate for use against American citizens? [<a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/128482.html" target="new">Link</a>, with hat tip to <a href="http://www.unscrewingtheinscrutable.com/node/2037" target="new">Jim Downey</a>]
</blockquote>
What next - depleted uranium? Air strikes against neighborhoods suspected of harboring people the police don't like?
<br /><br />
The "Patriot Act" (or <a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/41266f95">Traitor Act</a>, as I call it) has given police carte blanche to become nothing more than <a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/Thugs-with-Badges-Crackdo-by-Mark-Crispin-Mille-080901-795.html" target="new">thugs with badges</a>. Brutal <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/08/30/police_raids/index.html" target="new">crackdowns</a> on legitimate and peaceful political dissent are now standard operating procedure. Such legal niceties as the fourth and fifth amendments, laws against prior restraint etc. are quaint and obsolete.
<br /><br />
It'll take more than regime change to restore sanity and civility to the relationship between police and public. The genie has been let out of the bottle. Can it be pushed back in? Even if we take back our country at the next election, will it ever be the country it used to be?<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bed876#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Monster Mash</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bddd4c</link>
<description><![CDATA[Here's a video tribute to some classic horror movie monsters. There's Frankenstein, the Wolf Man, the... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bddd4c">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bddd4c</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48bddd4c</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48bddd4c</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48bddd4c" next="48bed876"/>
<category>John McCain</category>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<category>Hypochristianity</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>theocracy</category>
<category>George Bush Junior</category>
<category>Elections</category>
<category>stupidity</category>
<category>Video</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here's a video tribute to some <a href="http://classic-horror.com/newsreel/tribute_video_universal_monsters" target="new">classic horror</a> movie monsters. There's Frankenstein, the Wolf Man, the Creature from the Black Lagoon, and more.
<br /><br />
<div class="ctrimg"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6Yfib-czty8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6Yfib-czty8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></div>
<br /><br />
Speaking of monsters, let's check in with the RNC, where it has been announced that henceforth Sarah Palin will be officially known as Sarah Quaylin. And this is a horrible joke, and I'm a bad person for posting it, but you knew that already... anyway, I understand that the Secret Service has been given special instructions in the event that John McCain wins the election. Should he have a heart attack and die in office, their orders are to shoot Palin.
<br /><br />
Seriously though, I'm sure Palin would be a perfectly pleasant person to meet, but not only is she unqualified, John McCain's selection of her shows that <em>he</em> is unqualified to be president. He makes snap decisions based on his gut, and doesn't think them through. Is that the kind of leader whose finger we want on the button?
<br /><br />
It's obvious that McCain was in such a rush to announce a gimmicky pick and upstage Barack Obama's acceptance speech that he did not have Palin <a href="http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2008/09/02/palin-vetted-or-not-vetted/" target="new">vetted</a> enough, if <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/oliverburkemanblog/2008/sep/02/uselections2008.johnmccain" target="new">at all</a>. The announcement of her unmarried teenage daughter's pregnancy is a huge black eye as far as many conservatives are concerned, though it appears they are holding their noses and hypocritically rallying around the Palin family and the statutory-rapist father. As usual, Grover "Drown the Government in the bathtub" <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/01/palin.evangelicals/?iref=mpstoryview" target="new">Norquist</a> plumbs the depths of stomach-churning cynicism: "Before, they were excited about her, with the Down syndrome baby. But now with this, they are over the moon. It reinforces the fact that this family lives its pro-life values."
<br /><br />
I leave it to you to imagine the squawks of outrage and shrieking fits of the vapors the rethugs would wallow in if it came to light that a Democratic politician had a pregnant teenage daughter. Also, I find it interesting that the McCain campaign is so assiduously emphasizing that Bristol Palin supposedly chose of her own free will to have the baby - a choice both McCain and Palin would deny everyone else.
<br /><br />
In other news, I'm glad that Hurricane Gustav did far less damage than feared, but I'm sickened by the rethugs' smug self-congratulation over their token response. They urge their followers to donate some pocket change, then praise themselves to the skies for refraining from politicizing the hurricane, while doing <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/01/gop-governors-politicize_n_123040.html" target="new">just that</a>. Texas governor <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/02/uselections2008.hurricanegustav" target="new">Rick Perry</a> blathers: "You're seeing Republican governors in Republican states doing a fabulous job of taking care of the citizens. That's what we do." And Junior notes that all the gulf state governors were Republicans. Gee, I don't suppose it has anything to do with the fact that the federal government ethnically cleansed New Orleans by its apathy, incompetence and obstructionism, thus allowing the election of the unknown and unaccomplished Bobby Jindal, who otherwise wouldn't have had a prayer?
<br /><br />
More monster news as it happens...
<br /><br />
<strong>Update:</strong> Yet more <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/02/palin_slashed_funding_to_help.html?hpid=artslot" target="new">rethug hypocrisy</a>.<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bddd4c#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Atheism considered harmful?</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc7d39</link>
<description><![CDATA[Several months ago, I started reading Sam Norton's blog because he promised he would show that, contr... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc7d39">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc7d39</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48bc7d39</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48bc7d39</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48bc7d39" next="48bddd4c"/>
<category>atheist</category>
<category>church-state separation</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Several months ago, I started reading Sam Norton's blog because he promised he would show that, contrary to what most freethinkers would expect, Christianity is rational while <a href="http://elizaphanian.blogspot.com/2008/02/reasonable-atheism-central-post.html" target="new">atheism</a> is not only irrational but harmful. A great deal of verbiage later, I finally managed to find what Rev. Sam thinks atheism "misses in its worldview":
<ul>
<li><a href="http://elizaphanian.blogspot.com/2008/02/reasonable-atheism-6-what-is-acceptable.html" target="new">What is acceptable to the humourless atheist?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://elizaphanian.blogspot.com/2008/02/reasonable-atheism-2-on-wisdom.html" target="new">On wisdom</a></li>
<li><a href="http://elizaphanian.blogspot.com/2008/02/reasonable-atheism-5-is-wisdom.html" target="new">Is wisdom necessary?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://elizaphanian.blogspot.com/2008/02/reasonable-atheism-10-emotions-and.html" target="new">Emotions and decisions</a></li>
<li><a href="http://elizaphanian.blogspot.com/2008/06/reasonable-atheism-20-atheism-and.html" target="new">Atheism and choosing the good</a></li>
</ul>
According to Sam, there are two types of atheist: humorless and "reasonable" or "sophisticated". A humorless atheist (I've changed the British spelling to shut my spell checker up) denies that wisdom exists. Of course we should define our terms, and call bullshit if a theist tries to equate wisdom with god-belief, but I have no problem saying that there is something called wisdom to which we should aspire, and that science can't answer all the questions in life. Indeed there is a long, honorable and secular tradition of seeking wisdom, both as a personal endeavor and in the context of how a society should function.
<br /><br />
Since we essentially agree on these points, I don't have much to say on the first three links listed above. Also, it seems to me that "societal wisdom" is the more important question. I sometimes have theists trying to drag me into a discussion of their personal notions of spirituality, a prospect that holds no interest for me. People are free to believe whatever they wish, as long as they neither break my leg nor pick my pocket. The interesting question is how a society, especially a religiously diverse one, should be governed if the goal is harmony and justice. More on that below.
<br /><br />
The fourth link talks about how human decision-making is not purely logical, with emotions playing in fact a key role, even in a game like chess. This is an interesting point, but I don't think any deep theological significance can be read into it. Rather, it illustrates the point that the human brain is a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/27/books/review/Paul-t.html" target="new">kluge</a> which evolved in a haphazard fashion, like many other features in biology.
<br /><br />
So what is atheism "missing in its worldview"? Whoa, stop right there! Atheism is not a worldview. It is a component of many different worldviews, from the far left of communism to the far right of Ayn Rand's objectivism. That fact in itself should be a hint that atheism itself is not a worldview.
<br /><br />
Of course there are probably as many forms of atheism as there are atheists, but to me, atheism is not a destination but a starting point. It is a clearing away of magical thinking and egocentrism, and a recognition that nature is governed by impersonal forces rather than being suffused with some infinite and invisible but anthropomorphic spirit(s) with which it is possible to have a personal relationship, albeit as a helpless and unworthy supplicant. 
<br /><br />
Where the atheist goes from this starting point is up to him or her. Many choose not to go any further. Others choose to go off in various different directions. Since I want to explore some of the big questions I will press on to the fifth link, where we finally get some meat, though it turns out to be unfilling and unsatisfying.
<br /><br />
Sam writes:
<blockquote>
The more interesting questions are: 1. does the social acceptance of an agreed framework of values tend to enable people to be good or otherwise? And: 2. does atheism undermine the social acceptance of an agreed framework?
<br /><br />
(I think this was Peter Hitchens' essential point - that it is the breakdown of common belief that has undermined social virtue. It happens to have been Christianity in the British context, but it doesn't need to be.)
</blockquote>
Peter Hitchens is the younger brother of Christopher, but he is a conservative and a <a href="http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2008/05/atheism-stabbin.html" target="new">critic</a> of atheism. He equates it, and Sam apparently concurs, with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yobbo" target="new">British yob culture</a> and the old saw that "without God, all is permitted." This is a very tiresome and superficial criticism. Just as atheism is not a worldview in itself, it is not a moral or ethical system in itself, but can form the basis for various different systems. And I would argue that it is a better basis, since faith-based morality is arbitrary, imposed by fiat, and tends to obsess with ancient and rigid taboos rather than how our actions affect real people here on Earth in the here and now. Back to Sam:
<blockquote>
As I understand it, atheism doesn't (cannot) recognise anything outside of the individual conscience to which appeal can be made. From a (humourless) atheist point of view, for a common social order to be established, each individual member of the community needs to be intellectually persuaded of the merits of that order. The individual conscience is the lynchpin of the system, around which everything else pivots.
<br /><br />
What this misses out is the panoply of ways in which human beings operate non-rationally (note, NOT irrationally) on which their rationality depends. You could say that atheism has a hopelessly inadequate anthropology. In particular, choosing of the good depends upon evaluation, which is a form of emotional intelligence. Why shouldn't I have that extra portion of chocolate dessert? Why shouldn't I lie and cheat and steal and so on?
</blockquote>
The reason is very simple. People don't exist in a vacuum in isolation from one another. What we do has consequences for other people. We would like to persuade everyone of the rightness of the social norms, but there will always be some who don't get it or are just anti-social, and they have to be restrained from harming others. So we have to come up with a system that as many people as possible agree on, and then enforce it, but it is not true that we are paralyzed until we have unanimity.
<br /><br />
In my post <a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/47ae4076">Ding Dong The Wicked God is Dead</a>, I argued that ethical systems evolve along with the societies in which they are found. In previous centuries, most societies would be dominated by one religion or another, but there was broad agreement among different societies on the need to discourage theft, murder and so on - for the simple reason that any societies where murder and theft were no big deal would have died out.
<br /><br />
In the last few centuries, the limitations of faith-based morality monocultures have become all too clear with the advent of large-scale war, as such societies come into conflict. Today the old order is breaking down, with religiously diverse societies increasingly becoming the norm. The idea that we can have a commonly agreed-on social order that has a sectarian basis is getting more and more unrealistic, as is the notion that we can juggle different religions and not offend anyone. Conflicts between native-born Europeans and Muslim immigrants, with the latter becoming ever more aggressive in seeking to impose their religious strictures on the host society, are a good illustration of this problem.
<br /><br />
New types of societies need to evolve new ethical systems. The old religious models are breaking down, and we need to move to a more humanist approach rather than making a last-gasp and rather cynical effort to impose religious shibboleths on a diverse population. We need to focus on the good or harm our actions do to our fellow citizens, rather than the offense allegedly given to some old man with a beard who sits on a cloud.
<br /><br />
Coming up with such a system is of course a highly non-trivial undertaking, but to claim that atheism means the abandonment of all ethical systems is shallow and insulting. And I still haven't seen how atheism is supposed to be irrational...<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc7d39#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cretinism strikes again</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc6229</link>
<description><![CDATA[I spotted this on another blog, and since the blog owner restricts comments, I will post my response ... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc6229">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc6229</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48bc6229</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48bc6229</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48bc6229" next="48bc7d39"/>
<category>Creationism</category>
<category>stupidity</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I spotted this on another blog, and since the blog owner restricts comments, I will post my response here.
<br /><br />
<a href="http://shatteredparadigm.blogspot.com/2008/08/three-devastating-questions-to-ask.html" target="new">Three Devastating Questions To Ask Evolutionists &amp; Three Points Which Destroy The Theory Of Evolution And Show That Intelligent Design Is A Reality</a>
<br /><br />
This is incredibly ignorant. First of all, nobody is saying that a mouth or a lung suddenly evolved, fully formed and floating in space, before an animal evolved to use it. Less complex organisms, with less complex organs and systems, give rise to more complex ones. We see this going on at the present day as well as in the fossil record.
<br /><br />
Secondly, the Cambrian explosion was an "explosion" only on a geological timescale - it took place over at least 10 million years. It is absolutely <b>not</b> a problem for evolution. Again, we can see from the fossil record what the Cambrian organisms evolved from, and how they evolved during the "explosion".
<br /><br />
Finally, the whole concept of "the creation of new information that is required for one animal to turn into another animal" is meaningless. Information is all about how humans interpret patterns in data. Water doesn't "need information" in order to turn into ice - it just follows natural laws. Anyway, an animal doesn't turn into another animal - typically what happens is that a subpopulation of organisms splits off from a parent population, develops in isolation and in response to the environment, and after many generations shows features that are different from the parent population, to the point that they are different species.
<br /><br />
I'm tired of giving links which disprove the big lie that there are no transitional fossils. Evolution is going on continuously, so every fossil is a transitional fossil. Every time a "missing link" is found, in which fossil C fills the gap between fossil A and fossil B, the creationists start screaming about the new gaps between fossils A and C, and C and B.
<br /><br />
Oh, and nice bit of quote mining too. So much for the three devastating points!<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc6229#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Are you experienced?</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc3670</link>
<description><![CDATA[Michael Kinsley at Slate cuts through the rethug bullshit about experience, and gets to the heart of ... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc3670">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc3670</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48bc3670</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48bc3670</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48bc3670" next="48bc6229"/>
<category>John McCain</category>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Elections</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Michael Kinsley at <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2199029/" target="new">Slate</a> cuts through the rethug bullshit about experience, and gets to the heart of the matter:
<blockquote>
The question should be whether McCain - and all the other Republicans who have been going on for months about Obama's dangerous lack of foreign-policy experience - ever meant a word of it. And the answer is apparently not. Many conservative pundits woke up this very morning fully prepared to harp on Obama's alleged lack of experience for months more. Now they face the choice of either executing a Communist-style U-turn ("Experience? Feh! Who needs it?") or trying to keep a straight face while touting the importance of having been mayor of a town of 9,000 if you later find yourself president of a nation of 300 million.
</blockquote>
McCain's pick, as I've said before, reeks of panic and desperation, and shows that he is only focused on winning and not at all serious about governing. Given his advanced years and <a href="http://www.sodahead.com/question/122009/" target="new">declining mental health</a>, the choice of VP assumes unusual importance, and his decision is nothing short of reckless, further calling his judgment into question.<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc3670#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A gust of wind</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc2b93</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hurricane Gustav seems likely to be much weaker than originally feared. This is good news. Maybe Juni... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc2b93">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc2b93</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48bc2b93</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48bc2b93</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48bc2b93" next="48bc3670"/>
<category>Hurricane Gustav</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>George Bush Junior</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/homepageCrisis/idUKN01292385._CH_.242020080901" target="new">Hurricane Gustav</a> seems likely to be much weaker than originally feared. This is good news. Maybe Junior can share a birthday cake with John McCain after all.
<div class="ctrimg"><img src="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/Images/bushsuckthumb.jpg" width="171" height="200" alt="Bush sucking his thumb" /></div><br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc2b93#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sarah speaks!</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc296e</link>
<description><![CDATA[ The scary thing is that Sarah Palin really is this ditzy: Question: Are you offended by the phrase "... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc296e">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc296e</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48bc296e</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48bc296e</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48bc296e" next="48bc2b93"/>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<category>Hypochristianity</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>theocracy</category>
<category>church-state separation</category>
<category>stupidity</category>
<category>Humor</category>
<category>Video</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="ctrimg"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qEW12XLUM7A&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qEW12XLUM7A&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></div>
<br /><br />
The scary thing is that Sarah Palin really is this <a href="http://eagleforumalaska.blogspot.com/2006/07/2006-gubernatorial-candidate.html" target="new">ditzy</a>:
<blockquote>
<strong>Question:</strong> Are you offended by the phrase "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?<br />
<strong>Palin:</strong> Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.
</blockquote>
(Brief <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance" target="new">history lesson</a>: the Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892 by a socialist preacher, and "under God" was added in 1954 for the explicit purpose of promoting Christianity in violation of the Constitution.)
<br /><br />
Oh, and McCain's campaign has put out a press release saying that Palin's unmarried 17-year-old daughter is <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/09/01/america/daughter.php" target="new">pregnant</a> - apparently to <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/01/politics/animal/main4404466.shtml" target="new">scotch rumors</a> that Palin's last baby was actually her daughter's. Typically, the campaign intends to milk this development for sympathy votes, though Palin's choice of a shotgun marriage for her daughter further underlines her religious-right and anti-choice extremism. For all her talk of shattering the glass ceiling that Hillary cracked, Palin would pave it over with bomb-proof concrete!<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bc296e#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Palin' in comparison</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bb7575</link>
<description><![CDATA[Okay, forget the pregnancy rumor - here is something that's much bigger and infinitely scarier about ... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bb7575">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bb7575</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48bb7575</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48bb7575</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48bb7575" next="48bc296e"/>
<category>John McCain</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<category>theocracy</category>
<category>church-state separation</category>
<category>dominionism</category>
<category>christofascism</category>
<category>Elections</category>
<category>Conservative eliminationism</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Okay, forget the <a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48ba0b81">pregnancy</a> rumor - here is something that's much bigger and infinitely scarier about Sarah Palin. She is a <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/29/163234/559/495/579213" target="new">dominionist</a> linked to the fundamentalist terrorist group <a href="http://www.alternet.org/story/96945/theocratic_sect_prays_for_real_armageddon/?page=entire" target="new">Joel's Army</a>. Yikes! There is no way we can let this woman be an intermittent heartbeat away from the presidency. (HT: <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/08/be_afraid_1.php" target="new">PZ</a>)<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48bb7575#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mommy Dearest</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48ba0b81</link>
<description><![CDATA[The internet is buzzing with rumors that Sarah Palin's youngest, Downs syndrome child is actually her... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48ba0b81">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48ba0b81</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48ba0b81</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48ba0b81</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48ba0b81" next="48bb7575"/>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The internet is buzzing with rumors that Sarah Palin's youngest, Downs syndrome child is actually her 16-year-old daughter's. See for example <a href="http://forums.doghouseboxing.com/lofiversion/index.php/t130064.html" target="new">this page</a>.
<br /><br />
If it's true, I won't condemn the Palins for covering it up - but I will condemn Palin for spouting "family values" hypocrisy.<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48ba0b81#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>You can't make this stuff up...</title>
<link>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48b9c180</link>
<description><![CDATA[John McCain announced his choice of Sarah Palin as running mate at - wait for it - the Nutter Center... (<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48b9c180">Read more</a>)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48b9c180</guid>
<dc:creator>No More Mr. Nice Guy!</dc:creator>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/comments.rss/48b9c180</wfw:commentRss>
<trackback:ping>http://www.nmmng.co.uk/tb.php/48b9c180</trackback:ping>
<nmmng:meta id="48b9c180" next="48ba0b81"/>
<category>John McCain</category>
<category>Homophobia</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Creationism</category>
<category>Sarah Palin</category>
<category>theocracy</category>
<category>Environmentalism</category>
<category>church-state separation</category>
<category>Elections</category>
<category>stupidity</category>
<category>Rethug corruption</category>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[John McCain announced his choice of Sarah Palin as running mate at - wait for it - the <a href="http://www.daytondailynews.com/n/content/oh/story/news/local/2008/08/30/ddn083008mccaininside.html" target="new">Nutter Center</a>.
<br /><br />
While most people are still saying, "Sarah Who?", her background is gradually being filled in - and the more we find out about her, the more she looks like a Stepford Wife who is totally out of her depth. Apart from the <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/washingtonpostinvestigations/2008/08/exclusive_chief_fired_by_palin.html" target="new">ethics</a>&nbsp; <a href="http://www.pubrecord.org/politics/295-mccain-panders-to-christian-right-in-choosing-sarah-palin-as-vp.html" target="new">scandals</a> in which she's mired, Palin is the polar opposite of Hillary Clinton in every conceivable way - she's <a href="http://www.naral.org/elections/election-pr/pr08292008_palin.html" target="new">anti-choice</a> (even when the woman's life is in danger), <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-391-Denver-Gay-Examiner~y2008m8d29-Gov-Sarah-Palin-Pretty-and-pretty-antigay--a-winning-combination-for-McCain" target="new">anti-gay</a>, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/science/environment/la-na-mccainveepenviro30-2008aug30,0,3506869.story" target="new">anti-environment</a> and <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/08/29/palin-creationist/" target="new">anti-science</a>. The idea that she can woo Hillary supporters is laughable. And in view of McCain's advanced years and <a href="http://www.sodahead.com/question/122009/" target="new">poor health</a>, the very strong possibility that she would have to serve out most of his term is scary. As I said before, the whole stunt reeks of panic and desperation.
<br /><br />
McCain is building himself a Bridge to Nowhere!<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.nmmng.co.uk/48b9c180#comments">Comment on this post</a>)]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
